27.03.2009, 10:45
Moin moin,
But what about you using this newest logo for the Poland-DB? I think it's better than the actual one, where the blue is too dark and the drawing is a bit different imho?
Mfg Michael
(27.03.2009, 08:37)silvermane link schrieb: I know - but I was surprised at your choice of the file name.Yes, and I must apologize for that - I hope you believe me that there have not been any intentions included that you regrettably hear or read from the "Bund der Vertriebenen" here in Germany about regions in the former german east. I am definitely NOT of that political opinion!
Zitat:Why not name them dfs_wl_d_bismarckhuetter_sv_99 and dfs_wl_koenigshuette_germania_fv, respectively?The problem is, that these would be the wrong filenames for these two logos, what you can easily prove only by reading the text shown on the logo itself.
Zitat:AKS even has a separate logo as FV Germania (which you also used).Yes, and that is the only logo I use in all seasons in my database. But as you can read here AKS Chorzów can be correctly tagged as a legal successor of FV Germania. So I merely want to mention this fact in the "Mannschaften verwalten" function in DFS for means of completeness. And only there the AKS logo is used in my DB, as I think correctly.
Zitat:Besides, Ruch never played in any competition organized by the DFB, and was a Polish club from the start, so using its logo to represent SV 99 Bismarckhütter is definitely not correct.I thank you for this information, since my research on this club supplies contradicting results. Especially from what is written here you can come to the conclusion that Bismarkhütter SV 99 stands in the sequence of Ruch Chorzów. I will change that. Unfortunately, I have found no logo of Bismarkhütter SV 99. :-\
But what about you using this newest logo for the Poland-DB? I think it's better than the actual one, where the blue is too dark and the drawing is a bit different imho?
Mfg Michael